EByte e70 very Low sensitivity

Home Forums The libraries hosted on the site EByte RF e70 UART devices CC1310 EByte e70 very Low sensitivity

Viewing 4 reply threads
  • Author
    Posts
    • #30679
      Elkez
      Participant

        I noticed that the E70 module has a very low sensitivity (-110 dBm).
        At the same time, this is a relatively new product.

      • #30680
        Renzo Mischianti
        Keymaster

          Hi,
          yes, it’s quite impressive, and I start some penetration test and I notice that 4/5 wall (with meet iron) can’t block the signal.
          Bye Renzo

        • #30682
          Elkez
          Participant

            Hi Renzo
            I will be glad if you publish the test results of this module. I don’t think the E70 has a range of 1.5 km with that power and sensitivity.
            A range of approx. 500 m would be enough for me, but there are obstacles on the route (trees, buildings, cars, etc.)
            elkez

          • #30689
            Elkez
            Participant

              One request for you, Renzo.
              I’m all over the new and new wireless modules.
              It is not enough for me to order, assemble and test a single module and there is another, better, faster, more energy efficient, etc. I am not enough to follow the development and I no longer have the strength to constantly try something new.
              I need to make a simple device: 2 transmitters that would signal 2 states. On Off. The transmitters will be battery powered. A good addition would be a signal strength measurement (RSSI).
              Based on your experience, can you recommend a module that would meet these simple conditions? Range approx. 500m with various obstacles (wall, cars, people, trees), in short, normal outdoor traffic.
              Thanks for your willingness.
              Elkez

            • #30693
              Renzo Mischianti
              Keymaster

                Hi Elkez,
                I normally describe a device module thinking of a real scenario (I don’t write to have a visit), and I select the e70 because it has RSSI and a very good Sleep mode management to manage the battery. You probably never raise a distance if a device is declared for 1.5km but has high sensitivity.
                All to say, this can be considered a good solution.
                There are alternatives, but the efficiency can’t be the same.

                But in your case (low number of messages per second), I think it can be a good solution for a LoRa device like the e220.

                Bye Renzo

            Viewing 4 reply threads
            • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
            Exit mobile version