Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
For which ones are you planning to add support? The UART versions (E220-900T*S/D) or the SPI versions (E220-900M*S)? Just curious 🙂
Will check on those links later, thx!
But quick question already: Will I be able to communicate with RFM95W modules with the E220?
The E32 SPI looks like it could work with the arduino-lora lib, hence I can have a quality module as a gateway working with the RFM95W has cheap alternatives for the sensors 🙂
I gave it one more try:
So the E32 uses the Semtech SX1267 or 78. The RFM95W is a copy of the SX1276. So theoretically, if I would be able to control the chip directly via SPI and not via the UART “bridge”, I should be able to use the Arduino Lora lib…
I looked through the E-Byte website, but couldn’t really find a module that exposes the SPI interface. Are you aware of any? :/ Maybe I overlooked something. Thx!
Ah man, that’s sad… I also did some crawling through issues on “the other side” and it seems people have been able to mock what the e32 sends and receive it on an rfm95w, but not other way around…
That’s super sad 🙁 Just getting into LoRa and seeing that different modules for the same tech can’t communicate is pretty sad 🙁
Will probably go for the RFM95W then, as it’s cheaper and if I gonna do multiple sensors, this will quickly add up :/
Still, the E32 and your lib just feel… better!
Thanks for the help and greetings,
Andy!
