Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
Hi Koobs,
It’s very interesting. If you write a tuto, I translate It and put in an Article with your name.
Thanks, RenzoHi Fabio,
I have attached the library here. I think It’s fully working, and I must add more examples and do some wake-up tests.
Please, give me feedback.
Bye RenzoHi Alberto,
In the latest version, you can find a GCode sender, but if you add the procedure to do calibration, we can think about a specified widget to automate that process.
Bye RenzoHi George,
I buy modules from that two stores, and all modules are original. Select the less expensive.
I add a small selection of the cheapest devices on the article pages.Bye Renzo
Hi,
Erik is faithful, but I release the library for E220 in the following weeks, and the library for E22 is here.Ebyte LoRa E22 device for Arduino, esp32 or esp8266: library – 2
Bye Renzo
Hi Mustafa,
You can use a 20dbi or 30dbi module, and the second one can raise 8Km. If you need more, you can use E22 or E220 to raise 11km, but I think you need a good antenna and a 5v power supply with more powerful modules.If you get an E22 or E220, you can check RSSI to have data to elaborate.
In this topic, I do a simple comparison table on this topic.
E32 x E22 x E220Bye Renzo
Yes, it’s correctly, you can refer the article
Ebyte LoRa E22 device for Arduino, esp32 or esp8266: library – 2Bye Renzo
Hi George,
For E32, I develop a gateway with a graphical user interface that uses WebSocket (not MQTT).EByte LoRa E32 gateway: manage via REST and WebSocket (esp8266, esp32) – 1
EByte LoRa E32 Web Manager: description, configure and demo (esp8266, esp32) – 2You can add MQTT with a few codes, and if you have some patience, I will develop It for E22 and E220, but now I must finish the E220 library and documentation.
If you have some time to spend, we can collaborate for the E220 gateway, the conversion of the E32 version Is pretty fast, but the web interface to control it needs more time.
I think that spending more than 10$ on a gateway It’s a stupid thing :P.
Bye Renzo
Hi George,
I think you can use 915, but you can refer to the global table that I shared hereLoRaWAN LoRa Frequency Plans and Regulations by Country
Bye Renzo
Hi George,
we can schematize like so:E32 E22 E220 Chip sx1276-sx1278 sx1262-sx1268 LLCC68 Range 3Km - 8Km 5km - 11km 5Km - 10Km Repeater No repeater Repeater No repeater Remote conf No Yes No Power consumption Best Good Very Good Sleep 4μA Sleep 496μA Sleep 6μA Transmission and receiving have similar power consumption. Message size bytes 58 240 200 Buffer size bytes 512 (ok) 1000 (good) 400 (why?????) Max air data rate (bps) 19.2k 62.5k 62.5k Encryption One standard Configurable Configurable crypt Price Less expensive More expensive Less expensiveI think all devices are valid, but we must pay attention to buffer size, security and prices.
I think the E220 is a candidate for the best device, but 400b of the buffer can be dangerous if you want to use the max packet size and receive three messages simultaneously, you can lose one of them.
The E32, if you can find It at the best price, has a good compromise of all characteristics. But if you have sensing information, you can’t choose it; another pirate E32 can read your information (It must know frequencies, etc., not so simple).
If you have a reasonable budget, the E22 has the best characteristics, but sensing on power consumption (even if It’s low) from 4μA to 496μA can be a big step.
Bye Renzo
Hi Melis,
It’s not so simple to do that.
LoRa uses a small packet, and the speed can’t be elevated so that you can try, but the result isn’t sure.
Bye Renzo
