Home › Forums › The libraries hosted on the site › EByte RF e70 UART devices CC1310 › EByte e70 very Low sensitivity
- This topic has 4 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 1 year, 5 months ago by Renzo Mischianti. 
- 
		AuthorPosts
- 
		
			- 
2 May 2024 at 21:17 #30679I noticed that the E70 module has a very low sensitivity (-110 dBm). 
 At the same time, this is a relatively new product.
- 
2 May 2024 at 22:33 #30680Hi, 
 yes, it’s quite impressive, and I start some penetration test and I notice that 4/5 wall (with meet iron) can’t block the signal.
 Bye Renzo
- 
3 May 2024 at 08:35 #30682Hi Renzo 
 I will be glad if you publish the test results of this module. I don’t think the E70 has a range of 1.5 km with that power and sensitivity.
 A range of approx. 500 m would be enough for me, but there are obstacles on the route (trees, buildings, cars, etc.)
 elkez
- 
6 May 2024 at 18:43 #30689One request for you, Renzo. 
 I’m all over the new and new wireless modules.
 It is not enough for me to order, assemble and test a single module and there is another, better, faster, more energy efficient, etc. I am not enough to follow the development and I no longer have the strength to constantly try something new.
 I need to make a simple device: 2 transmitters that would signal 2 states. On Off. The transmitters will be battery powered. A good addition would be a signal strength measurement (RSSI).
 Based on your experience, can you recommend a module that would meet these simple conditions? Range approx. 500m with various obstacles (wall, cars, people, trees), in short, normal outdoor traffic.
 Thanks for your willingness.
 Elkez
- 
8 May 2024 at 08:53 #30693Hi Elkez, 
 I normally describe a device module thinking of a real scenario (I don’t write to have a visit), and I select the e70 because it has RSSI and a very good Sleep mode management to manage the battery. You probably never raise a distance if a device is declared for 1.5km but has high sensitivity.
 All to say, this can be considered a good solution.
 There are alternatives, but the efficiency can’t be the same.But in your case (low number of messages per second), I think it can be a good solution for a LoRa device like the e220. Bye Renzo 
 
- 
- 
		AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

 
 
																			


 
